The landscape of mixed martial arts (MMA) is defined not only by striking prowess but also by the tactical acumen shown in grappling and submission techniques. A submission victory can reflect a fighter’s skill level, creativity, and strategic decision-making. As the competition escalates in the UFC, judgments about what constitutes a remarkable submission exploit can be highly subjective and influenced by context. Recently, Paddy Pimblett, an emerging lightweight star, has sparked discussion by questioning if UFC champion Islam Makhachev’s latest submission should be lauded as the best of the year.
Pimblett’s Perspective on Makhachev’s D’Arce Choke
Islam Makhachev executed a fifth-round D’Arce choke against Dustin Poirier, marking the champion’s successful defense of his title. However, Pimblett, who recently made headlines with a submission victory over Bobby Green, argues that Makhachev’s triumph lacks the special allure typically associated with submission “of the year” accolades. He points out that Poirier, with four previous submission losses under his belt, should not diminish the value of the achievement. On his YouTube channel, Pimblett noted, “Sure, it was a good D’Arce choke, but I think it’s important to consider the context.”
The intricacies of a submission win matter significantly. While Makhachev’s performance was undeniably skillful, Pimblett draws a distinct comparison with his victory, suggesting that his submission of Green – the first of its kind in over a decade – stands on firmer ground. He remarked, “I transitioned from a guillotine to a triangle to an armbar from the feet…there’s something fresh about that,” suggesting that creativity and novelty are key components in evaluating submissions.
Pimblett believes that Khamzat Chimaev’s first-round submission of Robert Whittaker is a more noteworthy accomplishment. Whittaker, a former champion and a formidable opponent, had never before been submitted, and Pimblett seems to hold this feat in much higher esteem than Makhachev’s. The implication is that the level of adversity and the stature of the opponent significantly enhance the value of a submission victory, making Chimaev’s win more impressive in his eyes.
These critical remarks from Pimblett not only underscore the competitive nature of fighters within the UFC but also serve as a reminder of how rankings and accolades are perceived in the sport. As both Makhachev and Pimblett continue to climb the ranks, their respective achievements will be evaluated based on both skill and context. With Pimblett recently breaking into the lightweight rankings, his claims demonstrate an eagerness to assert himself among the elite while also stimulating conversations about the criteria for recognition in MMA.
While submissions are integral to the fight game, their evaluation can vary greatly among fighters and fans alike. Pimblett’s critique of Makhachev’s accomplishment illustrates the ongoing discourse that shapes the competitiveness within the lightweight division and the broader MMA landscape.